




Some thought and discussion on the GI scene in the UK and some irrelevant stuff on football





....made this conference one of the most interesting I have been to in the last year..
My overall thought was that the AGI got it right with this event. I went into it with some reservations, partly because I was talking about open source at a conference full of software vendors, and partly because I am pretty new to the AGI and didn’t know what to expect.
From talking to people throughout the event, as well as the entertainment that they put on, I really did feel that they were trying to get a sense of community, breaking down barriers between vendors and users.
Every time I fly into the UK I come with a outsider view, neutral to the events happening within the country. And what I saw and heard this year, as compared to last year, is that the audience has shifted. It is attempting to merge the ‘neogeography’ folks with traditional GI folks. It is striving to understand how new approaches and old approaches can possibly work together. It is wanting to move beyond ‘neo’ and ‘Web 2.0′ and is struggling to understand how to integrate highly complex geo-technologies with crowd sourcing, mass market contributor’s and how to interact with the rest of the geo-world.
It was interesting to hear comments about the need to inform people and help them to understand data - and is a responsibility of everyone in the GI community. It was interesting to hear people indicate that ‘professionalism matters’ and it was interesting to hear how people are combining user generated and traditionally generated geoinformation together.
And that was the point. I think the geocommunity reached the point this year where it realises that reference to the paleo or the neogeography community is passe, that it hinders the forward momentuum that seeks to integrate the traditional GI with what previously called neogeography and move the whole issue forward one more step.
I think AGI made a big leap. A leap that others in the world have yet to discuss and think on - as much. Not perfect, nor finished. But a real good start.
Now that I think was the point of the event.
Thanks for coming along, participating and spreading the word
http://www.edparsons.com/2008/09/the-paleotards-have-spoken/
http://apb.directionsmag.com/archives/4831-Web-2.0-Hype-Paper-Wins-Top-Presentation-at-AGI.html
http://apb.directionsmag.com/archives/4829-AGI-GeoCommunity-08-Keynotes-Day-One.html
http://blog.timwarr.net/2008/09/24/day-1-agi-2008-stratford-upon-avon/
http://blog.timwarr.net/2008/09/25/day-2-agi-2008-stratford-upon_avon/
http://vector1media.com/vectorone/?p=964
http://www.archaeogeek.com/blog/2008/09/26/back-from-agi-geocommunity-2008-part-one/
http://spatial8.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!7D3454CCB58F20E3!129.entry
My view
The GI industry in the UK is a mature community that is adapting (like many others) to some massive change brought about by technology and societal change. They are not as Ed Parsons has suggested "Paleotards" or the "Association of Empire Telegraph Operators" instead they are people who work with geo-information and systems on a daily basis supporting important and sometimes vital services such as urban planning and management, emergency services, flood defence and risk reduction, crime analysis, emargency planning and disaster response and (whether we like them being there or not) our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan - not quite as exciting as a buddy finder or personal tracking application on an iPhone I guess. The community is taking on board the immense opportunities that Google and others have opened up and are seriously debating how they can become part of their mainstream activities. Those who are surfing the wave of cutting edge may bemoan the fact that some of us are only just coming to grips with the basics of geotagging but I would suggest that the achievement of the conference and of our Geocommunity is that we are getting to grips with this stuff and not fighting it or ignoring it.
Enough of the debate between the traditional and new communities. Let me summarise some of the conclusions that I drew from the conference.
My favourite quotes
People can think we know more than we do because of the elegance of the visualisation.
Charlie Pattinson, Environment Agency CIO on 3D visuallisations
We are the last generation who will ever know it means to be lost
Sean Phelan, Multimap Founder
Best case - things are going to get worse. Worst case - things are going to get a lot worse.
Charlie Pattinson, Environment Agency CIO on areas predicted to be at risk of flood in 2080

The future is not like the past, and any strategy that is designed to protect the past will eventually failThe whole article is well worth a read too.
